Original review by Syihabudin Ahmad
This page was translated automatically from the approved Malay review. Consult the original if wording differs.
Short answer
This supplication appears in the narration of Abu al-Darda’ RA, al-Tirmidhi no. 3490. al-Tirmidhi graded it hasan gharib, but al-Albani graded it daif. This review selects the grading Daif because Abdullah bin Rabi‘ah al-Dimashqi is a majhul narrator. The meaning of the supplication is good and it may be used as a general supplication.
Arabic wording
كَانَ مِنْ دُعَاءِ دَاوُدَ يَقُولُ: «اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ حُبَّكَ، وَحُبَّ مَنْ يُحِبُّكَ، وَالْعَمَلَ الَّذِي يُبَلِّغُنِي حُبَّكَ، اللَّهُمَّ اجْعَلْ حُبَّكَ أَحَبَّ إِلَيَّ مِنْ نَفْسِي وَأَهْلِي، وَمِنَ الْمَاءِ الْبَارِدِ».
Translation
“Among the supplications of Dawud was: O Allah, I ask You for Your love, the love of those who love You, and deeds that will bring me to Your love. O Allah, make Your love dearer to me than myself, my family, and cold water.”
Narrator
Abu al-Darda’ RA
Sources and scholars
al-Tirmidhi; al-Hakim al-Naysaburi; al-Bazzar; al-Mubarakfuri; Muhammad Nasir al-Din al-Albani
Scholarly commentary
1. al-Tirmidhi, in Jami‘ al-Tirmidhi, Kitab al-Da‘awat, no. 3490, graded it hasan gharib.
2. al-Hakim, in al-Mustadrak, no. 3621, 2/470, graded its chain of transmission as sahih.
3. al-Bazzar, in al-Bahr al-Zakhkhar, no. 4089, 10/28, explained that he did not know this wording through any route other than that chain of transmission.
4. al-Mubarakfuri, in Tuhfat al-Ahwadhi, commentary on no. 3490, mentioned Abdullah bin Rabi‘ah bin Yazid al-Dimashqi as majhul, meaning a narrator whose standing is not sufficiently known.
5. al-Albani, in al-Silsilah al-Dha‘ifah, no. 1125, graded it daif. Therefore, the claim that he authenticated this narration is inaccurate.
Explanation
1. Does this wording have a source?
Yes. It is narrated in Jami‘ al-Tirmidhi no. 3490 as a supplication of Prophet Dawud AS, related by Prophet Muhammad SAW. The Companion who narrated it is Abu al-Darda’ RA.
2. Why was the grading Daif selected?
Its chain of transmission passes through Abdullah bin Rabi‘ah al-Dimashqi, who was graded majhul. Information about his reliability as a narrator is insufficient to establish this chain as sahih. This assessment differs from al-Tirmidhi’s grading of hasan gharib; that difference should be stated fairly.
3. May this supplication be recited?
It is permissible to supplicate with a good meaning: asking for Allah’s love and help in performing deeds. However, the status of the chain of transmission must be distinguished from the permissibility of reciting a supplication. One should not claim that this wording is sahih without explaining the difference of opinion in its grading.
4. Is there a specific number or time?
The narration being asked about does not establish a number of recitations, a specific time, or a promise of any particular reward. Such specifications should not be added in the name of hadith.
Conclusion
Status: Daif because the narrator Abdullah bin Rabi‘ah al-Dimashqi is majhul. al-Tirmidhi graded it hasan gharib, whereas al-Albani graded it daif. Its wording may be used as a good general supplication.
Have another hadith you would like to check?
Subscribe to HadithXpert to ask questions, receive initial AI answers, follow expert review progress and view your question history.
Guests can try one free question. A 3-day trial is available with the monthly plan.
